I appreciate the comments, Supo. I am not totally sure I understand exactly what you mean by "upper front temples - and - the distance from the temples from front to back" and "I think if you brought the temples forward and made the ear part shorter cut..."

Unfortunately, I don't have the vocabulary needed to describe these things as precisely as desirable. I understand the words "temple point" to be the point on the sides hairline that most juts out toward the middle of the face (i.e., toward the nose). When you say "upper front temples", do you mean the curve that goes from the temple point to the end of the front hairline? And when you say to bring the temples forward, do you mean to make the temple points more toward the middle of the face (closer to the nose)? That way, the angle from the temple point to the end of the front hairline would be less vertical than it currently is. Am I understanding you correctly?

Also, when you say "the area in front of the ear needs to be a little less density for about a half inch back", do you mean that the hair in between the ear and the temple point needs to be a little less dense for about a half inch from the "hairline" toward the back of the head??