This guy is 50 and I am fairly certain it's his natural hair. From my own point of view I want to keep full coverage, i.e not recede but lower density as the years go by. Philip Scofield has full coverage with diminishing density.

Michael parkinson is another one who I don't think wears and has almost no recession in his 60s even.

But back to my original point. I'm not saying temple points are make or break "necessarily" but if you are 50+ sporting a dense peice with no recession you have to have them IMHO

http://www.contactmusic.com/pics/lf/itv_...163102.jpg