(06-10-2011, 09:36 PM)Baldrich Wrote: Monofilament is old technology. It is a nylon mesh - much coarser than French lace. It's robust, but totally detectable. When I got my first piece, which was from a Hair Club-type of place, it was mono with a lace front. If you parted the hair anywhere on the piece, you could see the mesh.

With the price of Internet lace pieces as they are now, I can't think why anyone would still go for mono.

---

Monofilament is old technology. It is a nylon mesh - much coarser than French lace. It's robust, but totally detectable. When I got my first piece, which was from a Hair Club-type of place, it was mono with a lace front. If you parted the hair anywhere on the piece, you could see the mesh.

With the price of Internet lace pieces as they are now, I can't think why anyone would still go for mono.

---

Monofilament is old technology. It is a nylon mesh - much coarser than French lace. It's robust, but totally detectable. When I got my first piece, which was from a Hair Club-type of place, it was mono with a lace front. If you parted the hair anywhere on the piece, you could see the mesh.

With the price of Internet lace pieces as they are now, I can't think why anyone would still go for mono.

Agreed, when I went to HCM I had all mono, not even a lace front. It is old technology, and they still use it. If you want lace at HCM, it is more money. Can you believe for the $3500 a year that I gave them, I didn't even get lace!